nonlinear regression – log(agonist) vs. response (three parameters) model Search Results


90
SAS institute general linear model (glm) procedure
General Linear Model (Glm) Procedure, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/general linear model (glm) procedure/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
general linear model (glm) procedure - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SAS institute proc reg sas version 9.4
Proc Reg Sas Version 9.4, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proc reg sas version 9.4/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proc reg sas version 9.4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Minitab Inc linear regression analysis minitab release 12
Linear Regression Analysis Minitab Release 12, supplied by Minitab Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/linear regression analysis minitab release 12/product/Minitab Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
linear regression analysis minitab release 12 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab optimization toolbox
Matlab Optimization Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab optimization toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab optimization toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
DaVinci Biosciences davinci-003
Davinci 003, supplied by DaVinci Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/davinci-003/product/DaVinci Biosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
davinci-003 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc linear regression analysis function in graphpad prism 6.0
Linear Regression Analysis Function In Graphpad Prism 6.0, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/linear regression analysis function in graphpad prism 6.0/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
linear regression analysis function in graphpad prism 6.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc non-linear regression analysis
Non Linear Regression Analysis, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/non-linear regression analysis/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
non-linear regression analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc linear regression (surface area/volume ratio vs rate)
Linear Regression (Surface Area/Volume Ratio Vs Rate), supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/linear regression (surface area/volume ratio vs rate)/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
linear regression (surface area/volume ratio vs rate) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc four-parameter logistic model graphpad vs. 5.0, prism
Four Parameter Logistic Model Graphpad Vs. 5.0, Prism, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/four-parameter logistic model graphpad vs. 5.0, prism/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
four-parameter logistic model graphpad vs. 5.0, prism - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc microarray platforms illumina
(A) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients with LUAD based on high versus low TLR2 expression from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Statistical analysis was performed using log rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (B) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 in paired normal tissue and LUAD samples, with secondary only control. Scale bars, 250 μm. (C) TLR2 gene expression was compared between <t>preinvasive</t> LUAD lesions (AIS and MIA) and invasive LUAD lesions. Data presented as median +/− interquartile range (IQR). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images of preinvasive <t>LUSC</t> lesions, demonstrating that not all progress to invasive cancer; up to 30% regress to normal epithelium. (E) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 in preinvasive LUSC lesions that progressed to cancer or regressed to normal epithelium, with secondary only control. Scale bars, 25 μm. (F) TLR2 gene expression was compared between preinvasive LUSC lesions of equal grade that subsequently progressed to cancer (progressive [Prog]) or regressed to normal epithelium <t>(regressive</t> [Reg]). Data presented as median +/− IQR. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear mixed effects model to account for multiple samples from the same patient.
Microarray Platforms Illumina, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray platforms illumina/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microarray platforms illumina - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc hill non-linear regression curve fitting
(A) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients with LUAD based on high versus low TLR2 expression from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Statistical analysis was performed using log rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (B) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 in paired normal tissue and LUAD samples, with secondary only control. Scale bars, 250 μm. (C) TLR2 gene expression was compared between <t>preinvasive</t> LUAD lesions (AIS and MIA) and invasive LUAD lesions. Data presented as median +/− interquartile range (IQR). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images of preinvasive <t>LUSC</t> lesions, demonstrating that not all progress to invasive cancer; up to 30% regress to normal epithelium. (E) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 in preinvasive LUSC lesions that progressed to cancer or regressed to normal epithelium, with secondary only control. Scale bars, 25 μm. (F) TLR2 gene expression was compared between preinvasive LUSC lesions of equal grade that subsequently progressed to cancer (progressive [Prog]) or regressed to normal epithelium <t>(regressive</t> [Reg]). Data presented as median +/− IQR. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear mixed effects model to account for multiple samples from the same patient.
Hill Non Linear Regression Curve Fitting, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hill non-linear regression curve fitting/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hill non-linear regression curve fitting - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients with LUAD based on high versus low TLR2 expression from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Statistical analysis was performed using log rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (B) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 in paired normal tissue and LUAD samples, with secondary only control. Scale bars, 250 μm. (C) TLR2 gene expression was compared between preinvasive LUAD lesions (AIS and MIA) and invasive LUAD lesions. Data presented as median +/− interquartile range (IQR). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images of preinvasive LUSC lesions, demonstrating that not all progress to invasive cancer; up to 30% regress to normal epithelium. (E) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 in preinvasive LUSC lesions that progressed to cancer or regressed to normal epithelium, with secondary only control. Scale bars, 25 μm. (F) TLR2 gene expression was compared between preinvasive LUSC lesions of equal grade that subsequently progressed to cancer (progressive [Prog]) or regressed to normal epithelium (regressive [Reg]). Data presented as median +/− IQR. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear mixed effects model to account for multiple samples from the same patient.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Toll-like receptor 2 orchestrates a tumor suppressor response in non-small cell lung cancer

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111596

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients with LUAD based on high versus low TLR2 expression from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Statistical analysis was performed using log rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (B) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 in paired normal tissue and LUAD samples, with secondary only control. Scale bars, 250 μm. (C) TLR2 gene expression was compared between preinvasive LUAD lesions (AIS and MIA) and invasive LUAD lesions. Data presented as median +/− interquartile range (IQR). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images of preinvasive LUSC lesions, demonstrating that not all progress to invasive cancer; up to 30% regress to normal epithelium. (E) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 in preinvasive LUSC lesions that progressed to cancer or regressed to normal epithelium, with secondary only control. Scale bars, 25 μm. (F) TLR2 gene expression was compared between preinvasive LUSC lesions of equal grade that subsequently progressed to cancer (progressive [Prog]) or regressed to normal epithelium (regressive [Reg]). Data presented as median +/− IQR. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear mixed effects model to account for multiple samples from the same patient.

Article Snippet: For progressive vs regressive preinvasive LUSC gene expression analysis, Illumina and Affymetrix microarray platforms were used to analyze RNA extracted from patient samples from the UCLH Surveillance study.

Techniques: Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Control, Gene Expression, MANN-WHITNEY

(A) Representative IHC staining of normal alveolar tissue (normal) and lung tumors from Kras LSL-G12D /+ mice on a WT or Tlr2 −/− background for the SASP factors interleukin-1-alpha (IL-1 α ), interleukin-1-beta (IL-1 β ), and serum amyloid A (SAA), with corresponding quantification. n = 5–6 mice per group (five tumors/areas per mouse analyzed). Data presented as mean +/− SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey tests for multiple comparisons. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Scale bars, 100 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometry analysis plots of myeloid populations from whole-lung single-cell suspensions from tumor-bearing WT or Tlr2 −/− mice. Percentage denotes the percentage of the parent population. (C) Corresponding quantification of total immune cells (CD45 + ) and myeloid cells from WT (blue) and Tlr2 −/− (red) mice. Mono, monocyte; Eos, eosinophils; Mac, macrophage; Neut, neutrophils. n = 12 mice per group. Data presented as mean +/− SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test. *p < 0.05. (D and E) Representative IHC staining for the monocyte/macrophage marker CD68 in lung tumors from WT or Tlr2 −/− mice (D) with corresponding quantification (E). Data presented as mean +/− SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test. **p < 0.01. Scale bars, 100 μm. (F) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 and IL1 β in consecutive sections of LUAD and paired normal tissue. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Scatterplot with Pearson correlation analysis of IHC H-score analysis performed on serial sections for TLR2 and IL-1 β . (H) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 and IL-1 β in preinvasive LUSC lesions that progressed to cancer or regressed to normal epithelium. Scale bar, 25 μm. (I) Scatterplot with Pearson correlation analysis from IHC H-score analysis performed on serial sections for TLR2 and IL-1 β on preinvasive LUSC lesions that progressed to cancer or regressed to normal epithelium. (J) Heatmap demonstrating TLR2-SASP gene expression with clear clustering of progressive and regressive lesions. (K) The TLR2-SASP signature was compared between lesions of equal grade that subsequently progressed to cancer or regressed to normal epithelium. Data presented as median +/− IQR. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear mixed-effects model to account for samples from the same patient. (L) Scatterplot with Pearson correlation analysis comparing gene expression of TLR2 and the TLR2-SASP signature in Prog and Reg lesions.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Toll-like receptor 2 orchestrates a tumor suppressor response in non-small cell lung cancer

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111596

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Representative IHC staining of normal alveolar tissue (normal) and lung tumors from Kras LSL-G12D /+ mice on a WT or Tlr2 −/− background for the SASP factors interleukin-1-alpha (IL-1 α ), interleukin-1-beta (IL-1 β ), and serum amyloid A (SAA), with corresponding quantification. n = 5–6 mice per group (five tumors/areas per mouse analyzed). Data presented as mean +/− SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey tests for multiple comparisons. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Scale bars, 100 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometry analysis plots of myeloid populations from whole-lung single-cell suspensions from tumor-bearing WT or Tlr2 −/− mice. Percentage denotes the percentage of the parent population. (C) Corresponding quantification of total immune cells (CD45 + ) and myeloid cells from WT (blue) and Tlr2 −/− (red) mice. Mono, monocyte; Eos, eosinophils; Mac, macrophage; Neut, neutrophils. n = 12 mice per group. Data presented as mean +/− SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test. *p < 0.05. (D and E) Representative IHC staining for the monocyte/macrophage marker CD68 in lung tumors from WT or Tlr2 −/− mice (D) with corresponding quantification (E). Data presented as mean +/− SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test. **p < 0.01. Scale bars, 100 μm. (F) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 and IL1 β in consecutive sections of LUAD and paired normal tissue. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Scatterplot with Pearson correlation analysis of IHC H-score analysis performed on serial sections for TLR2 and IL-1 β . (H) Representative IHC staining for TLR2 and IL-1 β in preinvasive LUSC lesions that progressed to cancer or regressed to normal epithelium. Scale bar, 25 μm. (I) Scatterplot with Pearson correlation analysis from IHC H-score analysis performed on serial sections for TLR2 and IL-1 β on preinvasive LUSC lesions that progressed to cancer or regressed to normal epithelium. (J) Heatmap demonstrating TLR2-SASP gene expression with clear clustering of progressive and regressive lesions. (K) The TLR2-SASP signature was compared between lesions of equal grade that subsequently progressed to cancer or regressed to normal epithelium. Data presented as median +/− IQR. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear mixed-effects model to account for samples from the same patient. (L) Scatterplot with Pearson correlation analysis comparing gene expression of TLR2 and the TLR2-SASP signature in Prog and Reg lesions.

Article Snippet: For progressive vs regressive preinvasive LUSC gene expression analysis, Illumina and Affymetrix microarray platforms were used to analyze RNA extracted from patient samples from the UCLH Surveillance study.

Techniques: Immunohistochemistry, Flow Cytometry, Marker, Gene Expression